| Thread overview | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 13, 2013 Unqual fails with pointer? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
----
import std.traits : Unqual;
void main() {
static assert(is(Unqual!int == int));
static assert(is(Unqual!(const int) == int));
static assert(is(Unqual!(immutable int) == int));
static assert(is(Unqual!(shared int) == int));
static assert(is(Unqual!(shared(const int)) == int));
static assert(is(Unqual!int* == int*));
static assert(is(Unqual!(const int*) == int*)); /// Error: static assert (is(const(int)* == int*)) is false
}
----
Is this expected?
| ||||
June 13, 2013 Re: Unqual fails with pointer? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Namespace | On Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 21:32:19 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> ----
> import std.traits : Unqual;
>
> void main() {
> static assert(is(Unqual!int == int));
> static assert(is(Unqual!(const int) == int));
> static assert(is(Unqual!(immutable int) == int));
> static assert(is(Unqual!(shared int) == int));
> static assert(is(Unqual!(shared(const int)) == int));
> static assert(is(Unqual!int* == int*));
> static assert(is(Unqual!(const int*) == int*)); /// Error: static assert (is(const(int)* == int*)) is false
> }
> ----
>
> Is this expected?
This works:
----
template UnqualPtr(T) {
static if (is(T == shared(const U*), U))
alias UnqualPtr = U*;
else static if (is(T == const U*, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U*;
else static if (is(T == immutable U*, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U*;
else static if (is(T == inout U*, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U*;
else static if (is(T == shared U*, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U*;
else static if (is(T == shared(const U), U))
alias UnqualPtr = U;
else static if (is(T == const U, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U;
else static if (is(T == immutable U, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U;
else static if (is(T == inout U, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U;
else static if (is(T == shared U, U))
alias UnqualPtr = U;
else
alias UnqualPtr = T;
}
----
| |||
June 13, 2013 Re: Unqual fails with pointer? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Namespace | Just out of interest: how safe is something like this:
----
UnqualPtr!From unqual_cast(From : U*, U)(From from) {
union Cast {
From from;
UnqualPtr!From to;
}
Cast c;
c.from = from;
return c.to;
}
const B* cb = ...;
B* b = unqual_cast(cb);
----
compared to this:
----
const B* cb = ...;
B* b = cast(B*) cb;
----
I'm just playing around in favor of something like 'const_cast' from C++.
| |||
June 13, 2013 Re: Unqual fails with pointer? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Namespace | Namespace:
> Just out of interest: how safe is something like this:
>
> ----
> UnqualPtr!From unqual_cast(From : U*, U)(From from) {
> union Cast {
> From from;
> UnqualPtr!From to;
> }
>
> Cast c;
> c.from = from;
>
> return c.to;
> }
>
> const B* cb = ...;
> B* b = unqual_cast(cb);
> ----
>
> compared to this:
>
> ----
> const B* cb = ...;
> B* b = cast(B*) cb;
> ----
Both are quite unsafe. As you know modifying const data in D causes bugs. The second is more bug-prone because you have to state the type again, so it's not DRY.
Bye,
bearophile
| |||
June 14, 2013 Re: Unqual fails with pointer? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | Thank you. | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply