February 20, 2023
On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 07:04:31 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
>
> ...
> Having class-private doesn't preclude module-private. Dennis even submitted a PR implementing class-private, but it stalled because people couldn't agree on whether class-private should be "private to class" or "private to class instance".

It likely the 'disagreement' was intentional .. i.e. to stall ;-)

But in any case, it should be class private.

February 20, 2023
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 05:21:44 UTC, forky wrote:
> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 07:04:31 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> Having class-private doesn't preclude module-private. Dennis even submitted a PR implementing class-private, but it stalled because people couldn't agree on whether class-private should be "private to class" or "private to class instance".
>
> It likely the 'disagreement' was intentional .. i.e. to stall ;-)
>
> But in any case, it should be class private.

There have now been three pages produced by three people all agreeing with each other.

At what point does it start being spam?
February 20, 2023
>> But in any case, it should be class private.
>
> There have now been three pages produced by three people all agreeing with each other.
>
> At what point does it start being spam?

Having a discussion !== spam.
February 20, 2023
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 06:26:34 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:

>
> There have now been three pages produced by three people all agreeing with each other.
>
> At what point does it start being spam?

Yes, it's all just noise now. Let's end it here. Further posts in this thread will be deleted.
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Next ›   Last »