On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 19:03, Sean Kelly <sean@invisibleduck.org> wrote:

> The next release, 2.048, should bring things in line with TDPL.  I had meant to do this for 2.047, but was too busy with other work to finish in time.
>

Do you mean, indexing tuples directly by a CT value as in msg[1]? Because that was the only error here, I think.

So what's the word on this? Will we have simple indexing of tuples via T[] or do we still need T.field[] and T._1 ? The situations is the same in 2.048 as it was in 2.047.

There are more examples of tuples being used via T[] in some Phobos code examples (which don't compile and I've reported that).

Otherwise if it stays the way it is I'll send Andrei a message to add the corrections to the errata.

Philippe Sigaud Wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 19:03, Sean Kelly <sean@invisibleduck.org> wrote:
> 
> > The next release, 2.048, should bring things in line with TDPL.  I had meant to do this for 2.047, but was too busy with other work to finish in time.
> >
> 
> Do you mean, indexing tuples directly by a CT value as in msg[1]? Because that was the only error here, I think.
> 
> <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 19:03, Sean Kelly <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sean@invisibleduck.org">sean@invisibleduck.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
> The next release, 2.048, should bring things in line with TDPL.  I had meant to do this for 2.047, but was too busy with other work to finish in time.<br>
> </blockquote></div><br><div>Do you mean, indexing tuples directly by a CT value as in msg[1]? Because that was the only error here, I think.</div><div><br></div>
>