https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw=ph&test=plaintext
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json

D is finally showing up in the upper and middle parts of the tests. In some tests Vibe-D ( with LDC ) is showing a 10 to 80 times improvement compared to Round 14 ( where D was stuck at the bottom of the tests ).

Plain Text:

Round 15: vibed-ldc..1,200,034
Round 15: vibed........987,534
Round 14: vibed-ldc ....15,342
Round 14: vibed.........10,657

Json:

Round 15: vibed.......206,136
Round 15: vibed-ldc...126,668
Round 14: vibed-ldc....11,813
Round 14: vibed.........8,415

It does not need to be negative postings all the time. Now a smart person might use this data and analyse it into a blog, hint hint ...

Unfortunately they have use wrong results.  They have selected run from 31.1.2018. But If they use the other one from february, it would be better. But still is nice

Dne 15. 2. 2018 8:05 odp. napsal uživatel "Benny via Digitalmars-d" < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:

> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw= ph&test=plaintext https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>
> D is finally showing up in the upper and middle parts of the tests. In some tests Vibe-D ( with LDC ) is showing a 10 to 80 times improvement compared to Round 14 ( where D was stuck at the bottom of the tests ).
>
> Plain Text:
>
> Round 15: vibed-ldc..1,200,034
> Round 15: vibed........987,534
> Round 14: vibed-ldc ....15,342
> Round 14: vibed.........10,657
>
> Json:
>
> Round 15: vibed.......206,136
> Round 15: vibed-ldc...126,668
> Round 14: vibed-ldc....11,813
> Round 14: vibed.........8,415
>
> It does not need to be negative postings all the time. Now a smart person might use this data and analyse it into a blog, hint hint ...
>

On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 20:43:41 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> Unfortunately they have use wrong results.  They have selected run from 31.1.2018. But If they use the other one from february, it would be better. But still is nice
>


Can you post the numbers from Feb, for us here? :)

On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 20:59:53 UTC, Ali wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 20:43:41 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> Unfortunately they have use wrong results.  They have selected run from 31.1.2018. But If they use the other one from february, it would be better. But still is nice
>>
>
>
> Can you post the numbers from Feb, for us here? :)

My guess is that newer results can be found here: https://tfb-status.techempower.com

(Sorry for not posting the exact results, but I'm on the phone. I think we need to run some of their scripts to generate a nice graph from the json.)

https://tfb-status.techempower.com/raw/results.2018-02-09-10-22-34-441.json

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Petar via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 20:59:53 UTC, Ali wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 20:43:41 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately they have use wrong results.  They have selected run from 31.1.2018. But If they use the other one from february, it would be better. But still is nice
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can you post the numbers from Feb, for us here? :)
>>
>
> My guess is that newer results can be found here: https://tfb-status.techempower.com
>
> (Sorry for not posting the exact results, but I'm on the phone. I think we need to run some of their scripts to generate a nice graph from the json.)
>

On Thursday, 15 February 2018 at 19:04:53 UTC, Benny wrote:
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw=ph&test=plaintext
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>
> D is finally showing up in the upper and middle parts of the tests. In some tests Vibe-D ( with LDC ) is showing a 10 to 80 times improvement compared to Round 14 ( where D was stuck at the bottom of the tests ).

Does anybody know what exactly has changed to explain this large performance difference?

Hard to say, but I believe one of reasons is VibeManualMemoryManagement, another one would be same fixes in vibe-core and eventcore