On 2015-02-06 17:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> I see. Not surprising - some teams at Facebook also prefer phabricator
> over github for reviews (others don't). I'm using both and phabricator
> is somewhat - but not dramatically - better.

Any specifics you can point out where phabricator is better?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On 2/7/15 6:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2015-02-06 17:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> I see. Not surprising - some teams at Facebook also prefer phabricator
>> over github for reviews (others don't). I'm using both and phabricator
>> is somewhat - but not dramatically - better.
>
> Any specifics you can point out where phabricator is better?

E.g. comments are batched together, making one review one cohesive unit. People can't edit one another's comments. -- Andrei