Found this interesting link on proggit - https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md

D is mentioned in the generics part:

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md

On 29/08/2018 7:03 PM, JN wrote:
> Found this interesting link on proggit - https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md
> 
> D is mentioned in the generics part:
> 
> https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md 
> 

I like their design for contract's, it looks rather fitting for the language.

It's a real scaled back approach to a full blown signature design (which I want + WIP DIP).

On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 07:03:13 UTC, JN wrote:
> Found this interesting link on proggit - https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md
>
> D is mentioned in the generics part:
>
> https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md

Interesting document, it's a good sign that the D generics syntax reads the best to me. Good to see Go recognize that and reuse it, though without the exclamation point, which marks D template instantiations and they should use too.

On Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 07:03:13 UTC, JN wrote:
> https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md

I had a glance at the proposals.

The handler proposal seems not to account for errors during error handling. Can you have nested `handler` blocks? What would that do? Well, they'll figure it out eventually.