On 02-08-2012 21:18, Walter Bright wrote:
> Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.075.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.060.zip

Unfortunately ran into a couple of regressions (though nothing major).

One is here (and is fairly trivial to work around): http://j.mp/MftNLG

Another one, which I haven't quite worked out a reduction of, is that the 'result' here is being claimed by DMD to be an undefined identifier: https://github.com/lycus/mci/blob/master/src/mci/vm/code.d#L59

I just commented out the postcondition there for now. Will try to create a useful reduction later today.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex@lycus.org
http://lycus.org

Memory usage of my program when compiled by dmd2.057, 2.058, 2.059 & 2.060:
http://postimage.org/image/hqn6l4l8p/

It's a great improvement. Thanks for the new release.

On 02-Aug-12 23:18, Walter Bright wrote:
> Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.075.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.060.zip

Yay! And even more great pulls are coming.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

On 02-08-2012 21:48, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 02-08-2012 21:18, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.075.zip
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.060.zip
>
> Changelog is not updated?
>

It's updated now, but now the page just seems completely misrendered.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex@lycus.org
http://lycus.org

Ok, got another regression. Quite a scary bug.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8497

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:18 PM, dnewbie <run3@myopera.com> wrote:
> Memory usage of my program when compiled by dmd2.057, 2.058, 2.059 & 2.060: http://postimage.org/image/hqn6l4l8p/
>
> It's a great improvement. Thanks for the new release.

Wow.

On 2012-08-02 21:18, Walter Bright wrote:
> Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.075.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.060.zip

The changelog page is broken. It shows the "$(D_S D Change Log,"  macro.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On 8/2/12, Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sigaud@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:18 PM, dnewbie <run3@myopera.com> wrote:
>> Memory usage of my program when compiled by dmd2.057, 2.058, 2.059 &
>> 2.060:
>> http://postimage.org/image/hqn6l4l8p/
>>
>> It's a great improvement. Thanks for the new release.
>
> Wow.
>

Might be just a Phobos function which was improved? I'm seeing the exact same memory use for my apps.

On Thursday, 2 August 2012 at 20:38:11 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 8/2/12, Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sigaud@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:18 PM, dnewbie <run3@myopera.com> wrote:
>>> Memory usage of my program when compiled by dmd2.057, 2.058, 2.059 &
>>> 2.060:
>>> http://postimage.org/image/hqn6l4l8p/
>>>
>>> It's a great improvement. Thanks for the new release.
>>
>> Wow.
>>
>
> Might be just a Phobos function which was improved? I'm seeing the
> exact same memory use for my apps.

More likely it's probably just that a Phobos module was changed to import less.

Am Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:18:37 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright <newshound2@digitalmars.com>:

> Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.075.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.060.zip

A new Gentoo ebuild is submitted for review as well. Thanks for the posix.mak changes and zlib update, I could delete quite a bit of my patch. By the way, it would be great if the bash completion script was also available in the .zip distribution.

-- 
Marco