I recall we have nothing in the review queue for the time being, is that correct?

If that's the case, allow me to tender std.benchmark again for inclusion into Phobos. I reworked the benchmarking framework for backward compatibility, flexibility, and convenience.

Code: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/794

Dox: http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_benchmark.html

There are a few enhancement possibilities (such as tracking system/user time separately etc), but there is value in keeping things simple and convenient. Right now it really takes only one line of code and observing a simple naming convention to hook a module into the benchmarking framework.

Looking for a review manager!


Thanks,

Andrei

On 9/17/12, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
> snip

Don't want to hijack the thread, but I found Philippe's templates really useful for quickly adding timers to functions, e.g.: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/568cd71f

On Monday, September 17, 2012 13:24:00 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I recall we have nothing in the review queue for the time being, is that correct?

Technically speaking, I think that there are a few items in the review queue, but no one is pushing for their stuff to be reviewed right now, and I have no clue whether any of it is actually, currently in a reviewable state. So, I see no problem with std.benchmark getting reviewed right now, since no other reviews are in progress or even being pushed for.

- Jonathan M Davis

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I recall we have nothing in the review queue for the time being, is that correct?
> 
> If that's the case, allow me to tender std.benchmark again for inclusion into Phobos. I reworked the benchmarking framework for backward compatibility, flexibility, and convenience.
> 
> Code: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/794
> 
> Dox: http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_benchmark.html
> 
> There are a few enhancement possibilities (such as tracking system/user time separately etc), but there is value in keeping things simple and convenient. Right now it really takes only one line of code and observing a simple naming convention to hook a module into the benchmarking framework.
> 
> Looking for a review manager!

I'd like to organize the review.
If that's fine with you I'll post the announcement in a separate thread.

Jens

On 9/17/12 4:10 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Looking for a review manager!
>
> I'd like to organize the review.
> If that's fine with you I'll post the announcement in a separate thread.
>
> Jens

Thanks Jens. Of course that's fine with me. Let the destruction begin!

Andrei