I was thinking it could be improved by either allowing @"string" attributes, similar to @identifier, or by allowing a string literal after the unittest keyword:

unittest "Johny" {
    // Has @("Johny") as first UDA
}

This would provide a more ergonomic, standardized way of naming tests, and it's a very simple parser change (there's currently nothing allowed between unittest {).

In many other languages, unittests are regular functions with names, but Zig-test has this syntax for comparison:

test "Johny" {
}

Question to the community: do you name tests, and do you like the idea?