May 30, 2023 [Issue 23946] New: specifications state that "there can only be destructor" which can be confusinf because of mixin templates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23946 Issue ID: 23946 Summary: specifications state that "there can only be destructor" which can be confusinf because of mixin templates Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: dlang.org Assignee: nobody@puremagic.com Reporter: b2.temp@gmx.com ยง2 of https://dlang.org/spec/class.html#destructors states that "There can be only one destructor per class, the destructor does not have any parameters, and has no attributes. It is always virtual." However this creates confusion as mixin templates are allowed to introduce a destructor. eg. ``` import std; mixin template AddNewDtor() { ~this() { writeln("Mixin dtor"); } } class Foo { ~this() { writeln("Class dtor"); } mixin AddNewDtor; } void main() { { auto s = scoped!Foo; // prints `Mixin dtor` // prints `Class dtor` } } ``` The specifications should be more clear. While some might know that there are the internal __dtor and __xdtor functions, the specs should mention that "destructors introduced by mixin templates are implicitly called by the main destructor and does not represent a real destructor" in https://dlang.org/spec/template-mixin.html. That's just a suggestion, any other solution that would prevent a possible confusion for new comers is welcome. See NG thread : https://forum.dlang.org/post/czoaymnhawdtishtckfk@forum.dlang.org -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation