| Thread overview | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 04, 2012 DMD 2.060 problems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Attachments:
| I am getting indications that there are a number of very severe
thread-related breakages in 2.060 at least on Debian Unstable using the
debs. Some of my codes that use threads explicitly work fin with 2.059
but are showing a variety of errors with 2.060. I will put a few bug
reports in and then revert to 2.059 :-((
--
Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
| |||
August 04, 2012 Re: DMD 2.060 problems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russel Winder | On 04-08-2012 13:32, Russel Winder wrote: > I am getting indications that there are a number of very severe > thread-related breakages in 2.060 at least on Debian Unstable using the > debs. Some of my codes that use threads explicitly work fin with 2.059 > but are showing a variety of errors with 2.060. I will put a few bug > reports in and then revert to 2.059 :-(( > > Can you give some more details of how things are breaking? A *lot* of threading and GC related patches were applied in 2.060, and it's certainly not impossible that some of them have broken something, but I need more details to get an idea of what's going wrong. -- Alex Rønne Petersen alex@lycus.org http://lycus.org | |||
August 04, 2012 Re: DMD 2.060 problems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alex Rønne Petersen Attachments:
| On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 15:24 +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote: […] > Can you give some more details of how things are breaking? > > A *lot* of threading and GC related patches were applied in 2.060, and it's certainly not impossible that some of them have broken something, but I need more details to get an idea of what's going wrong. I put up issue 8505 as an easy one, well easy to report anyway. I marked it blocking but it is also a regression. I am not sure how to treat "regression" in terms of a total ordering with "blocking" and "critical". Hopefully the fix is easy and 2.061 can come out quickly. I have other problems which merit bug reports, but I need to do a few bits and pieces to ensure all the reports are about 2.059 → 2.060 and not just trivial bugs in my code. I believe I have two possibly three different issues, all threads related in some way, not just different views on the same problem. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder | |||
August 04, 2012 Re: DMD 2.060 problems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russel Winder | On 8/4/2012 6:50 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> I put up issue 8505 as an easy one, well easy to report anyway. I
> marked it blocking but it is also a regression. I am not sure how to
> treat "regression" in terms of a total ordering with "blocking" and
> "critical". Hopefully the fix is easy and 2.061 can come out quickly.
If it's a regression, that should be the category. Other remarks about its importance should go in the comments.
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply