March 29, 2013 Review for std.uni? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Just wondering what's the status of the new std.uni. Isn't it supposed to be going through review right now? Or was it merged and I missed it? I'd *really* like to have it in the next release. Can we kickstart its review and inclusion in Phobos ASAP?
T
--
The peace of mind---from knowing that viruses which exploit Microsoft system vulnerabilities cannot touch Linux---is priceless. -- Frustrated system administrator.
|
March 29, 2013 Re: Review for std.uni? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to H. S. Teoh | 29-Mar-2013 06:05, H. S. Teoh пишет: > Just wondering what's the status of the new std.uni. Isn't it supposed > to be going through review right now? Or was it merged and I missed it? > I'd *really* like to have it in the next release. Can we kickstart its > review and inclusion in Phobos ASAP? > > Would be nice provided that we find the review manager. The last two things I need to do with it are: 1. Put it as a pull request for Phobos 2. Add a table of Blocks, Scripts and properties that are actually supported to the DDOCs. Maybe some other minor nits that you have found that I haven't fixed up yet :) In any event it looks like std.process is getting a bit ahead of std.uni e.g. it has a pull request ... -- Dmitry Olshansky |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation