see my recent regressions I posted on bugzilla.

On 10/31/13, 2:19, Timothee Cour wrote:
> see my recent regressions I posted on bugzilla.

Ugh, you don't want to know how much time I wasted on this. I was convinced it was something I had done, some old phobos somewhere.

On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 01:19:59 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
> see my recent regressions I posted on bugzilla.

Adding a link always helps:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11392

Do you have any idea if this worked in beta 1-3 ? It would help locate the regression. I *pray* it's not in emplace :/

On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 08:42:49 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 01:19:59 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
>> see my recent regressions I posted on bugzilla.
>
> Adding a link always helps:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11392
>
> Do you have any idea if this worked in beta 1-3 ? It would help locate the regression. I *pray* it's not in emplace :/

This bug also seems to affect GDC and LDC.

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wzzfsnshgdjdoypanamp@forum.dlang.org#post-qrftnizdsbuimxicolov:40forum.dlang.org

On 31 October 2013 08:56, Gary Willoughby <dev@nomad.so> wrote:

> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 08:42:49 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 01:19:59 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
>>
>>> see my recent regressions I posted on bugzilla.
>>>
>>
>> Adding a link always helps: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=11392<http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11392>
>>
>> Do you have any idea if this worked in beta 1-3 ? It would help locate the regression. I *pray* it's not in emplace :/
>>
>
> This bug also seems to affect GDC and LDC.
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/**wzzfsnshgdjdoypanamp@forum.** dlang.org#post-**qrftnizdsbuimxicolov:40forum.**dlang.org<http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wzzfsnshgdjdoypanamp@forum.dlang.org#post-qrftnizdsbuimxicolov:40forum.dlang.org>
>


I can't reproduce on GDC development.

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 08:42:49 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 01:19:59 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
>> see my recent regressions I posted on bugzilla.
>
> Adding a link always helps:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11392
>
> Do you have any idea if this worked in beta 1-3 ? It would help locate the regression. I *pray* it's not in emplace :/

From what I know, direntries/ByLine bugs may be related to temporary structs dtor bugs in cases of exception. In some cases dmd incorrectly generates code, so if you have within function scope struct dtor invocation and call to some function which throws exception, there are may be segfaults. These bugs are sensitive to g and O switches and typically involve memory corruption in Refcounted struct dtor.

Probably related

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9438

I haven't debugged new issues so don't take this for sure.

What is more important that there is issue in bugzilla which likely is root of these dtor/RefCounted/dirEntries/ByLine problems which I was debugging and which is not still fixed, but I cannot find it right now.

On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 08:56:12 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
> This bug also seems to affect GDC and LDC.
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wzzfsnshgdjdoypanamp@forum.dlang.org#post-qrftnizdsbuimxicolov:40forum.dlang.org

How is this related to the (since fixed) LDC dirEntries issue?

The latter was a linking problem due to LDC trying to second-guess DMD's (up to 2.063.2) naive template emission strategy.

David

On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 12:00:33 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 08:56:12 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
>> This bug also seems to affect GDC and LDC.
>>
>> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wzzfsnshgdjdoypanamp@forum.dlang.org#post-qrftnizdsbuimxicolov:40forum.dlang.org
>
> How is this related to the (since fixed) LDC dirEntries issue?
>
> The latter was a linking problem due to LDC trying to second-guess DMD's (up to 2.063.2) naive template emission strategy.
>
> David

My mistake.

On 2013-10-31 09:42, monarch_dodra wrote:

> Adding a link always helps:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11392
>
> Do you have any idea if this worked in beta 1-3 ? It would help locate
> the regression. I *pray* it's not in emplace :/

Just run a git bisect with an automated test.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg