The documentation is outdated and obfuscates google searches

On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 02:56:08 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> The documentation is outdated and obfuscates google searches

How is it outdated?

On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 05:13:49 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 02:56:08 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
>> The documentation is outdated and obfuscates google searches
>
> How is it outdated?

In the /library version there are many broken links/anchors. It doesn't really matter if it's outdated or not. The fact that we now have 3 public URLs for each reference page is crazy.

For example:

http://dlang.org/phobos/std_string.html
http://dlang.org/library/std/string.html
http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/std/string.html

On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 13:49:32 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
> In the /library version there are many broken links/anchors.

You can report issues with the DDox documentation here:

https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues

> It doesn't really matter if it's outdated or not.

Whether it "really matters" or not is not relevant to my question. I asked because it should be completely synced with the DDoc version, as it is generated from the same source. If the two are not in sync, that would indicate a problem somewhere, possibly something I can fix.

> The fact that we now have 3 public URLs for each reference page is crazy.
>
> For example:
>
> http://dlang.org/phobos/std_string.html
> http://dlang.org/library/std/string.html
> http://dlang.org/library-prerelease/std/string.html

Four:

http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_string.html

The -prerelease versions are excluded from search engine indexing.