On Saturday, 19 June 2021 at 10:40:45 UTC, Bradley Chatha wrote:>
What are the chances though that the path/syntax can be changed at this point though, mostly in regards to convincing people? Not just for this suggestion, but any suggestion/criticism towards DIP 1000 in general?
I think it is mostly up to the other compiler devs to convince Walter? I don't think there is anything I can do anyway.>
My main worry is that we'll end up with an inflexible, hard to understand system that doesn't even do the job right. Yet another tacked on feature for the language, etc.
This is a good reason to have an experimental branch and let new features sit there until people get enough experience with them.