In the left-hand side menu, if you open "std" then "experimental", you'll see how "allocator" appears twice: once as a tree node, once as a leaf. Same inside the "allocator" node, "building_blocks" appears duplicated etc.

I shouldn't need to micromanage this stuff. Would love it if folks raised matters like these whenever they see it - and there might be more. Whenever you see a rat you should count on ten more hidden about.


Andrei

On Saturday, 16 April 2016 at 20:54:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> In the left-hand side menu, if you open "std" then "experimental", you'll see how "allocator" appears twice: once as a tree node, once as a leaf. Same inside the "allocator" node, "building_blocks" appears duplicated etc.
>
> I shouldn't need to micromanage this stuff. Would love it if folks raised matters like these whenever they see it - and there might be more. Whenever you see a rat you should count on ten more hidden about.

Perhaps no one's noticed it. I'm not seeing any duplication at all. On Windows, using Chrome, FireFox, Opera, Edge, and IE 11. In ever case, once I open std, experimental is already open and there are no duplicates.

On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 00:55:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I'm not seeing any duplication at all.

It is only on the ddox pages:

http://dlang.org/library/

I think ddox sees the "package" as a collection of modules and makes a tree node out of it, then sees package.d as a leaf node.

> Perhaps no one's noticed it.

Indeed, probably because very few people use the ddox pages (and those that do often post here saying wtf, why are there two versions of the docs on the official site?)


BTW, my superior doc site handles it this way:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.experimental.allocator.html

It marries the package.d contents along with the other concept of package as a collection of submodules.

On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 02:03:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> BTW, my superior doc site handles it this way:
> http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.experimental.allocator.html
>
> It marries the package.d contents along with the other concept of package as a collection of submodules.

The "source" link at the bottom is broken, though.

On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 09:43:09 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
> The "source" link at the bottom is broken, though.

That's a ddoc misdesign that I'm in the process of correcting.