August 09, 2016
On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 06:27:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 03:21:37 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
>> My impression of Go is that it has good production quality.
> go is... not a very good language.

It probably seems a bit savorless but to the extent that it was designed "as a better C" there's no scam.

Also it was very quickly bottstrapped. I wonder if bootstrapping was not a priority over the features set.
August 09, 2016
On Thursday, 4 August 2016 at 20:15:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:

> but the measurement code is available for others to use

It's down to you --

"If you're interested in something not shown on the benchmarks game website then please take the program source code and the measurement scripts and publish your own measurements."

You've already found the measurement scripts --

To help you start, I've gone through the archive and zip'd the previously-contributed D programs which you should probably update --
Next ›   Last »
1 2 3 4