http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm

D is #14 now, but the good part that it's credited as a mainstream language
(see the status: A--)

good work, thanks to everyone :)
-- 
Tiberiu Gal

Tiberiu Gal wrote:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
> 
> D is #14 now, but the good part that it's credited as a mainstream language
> (see the status: A--)
> 
> good work, thanks to everyone :)
> --Tiberiu Gal

That is totally cool! Next goal, top 10!

Tiberiu Gal wrote:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
> 
> D is #14 now, but the good part that it's credited as a mainstream language
> (see the status: A--)
> 
> good work, thanks to everyone :)

Like everybody knows, Google &co modified their algorithms in early 2004, which resulted in the Tiobe chart looking like an inkblot. It took some 18 months for everything to return to normal. I had to edit it to see what's there, so I attached it here for you guys.

It looks like Java, C and C++ are determined to make room for D!!!

My apologies to those who are on a modem line and still read OT labelled posts. ;-)

Tiberiu Gal wrote:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
> 
> D is #14 now, but the good part that it's credited as a mainstream language
> (see the status: A--)
> 
> good work, thanks to everyone :)
> --Tiberiu Gal

:o

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D

"Tiberiu Gal" <galtiberiu.backspace@gmail.com> wrote in message news:op.tj0v1nl8oyfj5w@kkk-049e084c5dc...
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>
> D is #14 now, but the good part that it's credited as a mainstream
> language
> (see the status: A--)
>
> good work, thanks to everyone :)

A--!  No way!!

Wooooo!

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Tiberiu Gal" <galtiberiu.backspace@gmail.com> wrote in message news:op.tj0v1nl8oyfj5w@kkk-049e084c5dc...
>> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>>
>> D is #14 now, but the good part that it's credited as a mainstream language
>> (see the status: A--)
>>
>> good work, thanks to everyone :)
> 
> A--!  No way!!
> 
> Wooooo! 
> 
> 

I have to say, it'll be scary when we bypass PL/SQL on that list.

To think that D will make more of a dent in Google's database than all of the sites that say "why doesn't this SELECT statement work?"

-- 
- EricAnderton at yahoo