I'm using cv2pdb to debug dmd with Visual Studio.
Recently I encountered some strange behavior where a StorageClass was
represented as an int[].

This is probably caused by this bug that has been fixed in dmd but is still present in the dmc backend: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3373

Would be nice if this could be fixed or at least reported.

The bugzilla for the C++ compiler is:

http://bugzilla.digitalmars.com/issues

Trass3r wrote:
> I'm using cv2pdb to debug dmd with Visual Studio.
> Recently I encountered some strange behavior where a StorageClass was
> represented as an int[].
>
> This is probably caused by this bug that has been fixed in dmd but is still present in the dmc backend: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3373
>
> Would be nice if this could be fixed or at least reported.
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>
>

> The bugzilla for the C++ compiler is:
>
> http://bugzilla.digitalmars.com/issues

Thanks.
Is dmc still in development (or maintenance) at all?

mrmocool at gmx.de wrote:
>> The bugzilla for the C++ compiler is:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.digitalmars.com/issues
>
> Thanks.
> Is dmc still in development (or maintenance) at all?
>

Sure, I just released a new version last week.

On 4 June 2010 21:02, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>
> mrmocool at gmx.de wrote:
>>>
>>> The bugzilla for the C++ compiler is:
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.digitalmars.com/issues
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Is dmc still in development (or maintenance) at all?
>>
>
> Sure, I just released a new version last week.

You didn't mention it on c.announce?

Don Clugston wrote:
> On 4 June 2010 21:02, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> 
>> mrmocool at gmx.de wrote:
>> 
>>>> The bugzilla for the C++ compiler is:
>>>>
>>>> http://bugzilla.digitalmars.com/issues
>>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> Is dmc still in development (or maintenance) at all?
>>>
>>> 
>> Sure, I just released a new version last week.
>> 
>
> You didn't mention it on c.announce?
>
> 

Just on c. But I just now put it on c.announce.

pragma(lib, ..) is pretty useless without a dmd switch to specify search paths for it.

mrmocool at gmx.de wrote:
> pragma(lib, ..) is pretty useless without a dmd switch to specify search paths for it.

Good point! Overall it would be just awesome to encapsulate some arcane flags in a simple pragma interface.

Andrei

    -L-Lpath

works for me on Linux.

mrmocool at gmx.de wrote:
> pragma(lib, ..) is pretty useless without a dmd switch to specify search paths for it.
>

The idea is that pragma(lib, ...) is useless if it's not a single point of modification. If a library requires an extra command line artifact, it may as well give up on the pragma and require two command line artifacts.

Andrei

Walter Bright wrote:
>    -L-Lpath
> 
> works for me on Linux.
> 
> mrmocool at gmx.de wrote:
>> pragma(lib, ..) is pretty useless without a dmd switch to specify search paths for it.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals