February 13, 2016 [Discussion] Usefulness of Algebraic? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
struct Some(T){
T value;
}
struct None{}
struct Option(T){
alias OptionAdt(T) = Algebraic!(Some!T, None);
OptionAdt!T value; //Should default to none
//OptionAdt!T value = OptionAdt!T(None());
/*
Error: memcpy cannot be interpreted at compile time, because it has no
available source code
*/
}
It is a bit unfortunate that the default value of Option!T.init is neither Some!T nor None.
Also Algebraic probably has to be wrapped in a struct because D can not infer the type of T for the following code.
alias Option(T) = Algebraic!(Some!T, None);
bool test(T)(auto ref Option!T o){
return true;
}
I really love ADT's but I think that they can not be used as a default value limits their usefulness.
/discuss
| ||||
February 13, 2016 Re: [Discussion] Usefulness of Algebraic? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to maik klein | For reference, the TaggedAlgebraic struct that I wrote some time ago supports this: https://github.com/s-ludwig/taggedalgebraic You could do something similar to this: struct Option(T) { struct Kinds(T) { typeof(null) none; T some; } TaggedAlgebraic!Kinds data; alias data this; @property bool hasValue() const { return data.kind == TaggedAlgebraic!Kinds.Kind.some; } } void test() { Option!int opt; assert(!opt.hasValue); opt = 12; assert(opt.hasValue); assert(opt == 12); } | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply