this does not compile:

##################
class C
{
	this()
	{
		f();
	}

	static {
		void f(int i)
		{
		}
	}

	void f()
	{
	}

	//

	void ff()
	{
		f();
	}
}

int main(char[][] args)
{
	return 0;
}
##############
$ dmd OneNotZero.d -I~/dmd/src/phobos
OneNotZero.d(5): need 'this' to access member f
##############
if the static method f is defined after
the non static method f compiles OK

I found this when the compiler issued the message: "./leds/ProjectTarget.d(664): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 0" on a similar situation

Ant

Yea ive never seen static { } , I dont think that should be allowed ( or is that the bug your reporting ? )

This compiles though

class C
{
	this()
	{
		f();
	}

	static void f(int i)
	{
	}
	

	void f()
	{
	}

//

	void ff()
	{
		f();
	}
}

int main(char[][] args)
{
	return 0;
}


On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:05:07 -0400, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:

> this does not compile:
>
> ##################
> class C
> {
> 	this()
> 	{
> 		f();
> 	}
> 	
> 	static {
> 		void f(int i)
> 		{
> 		}
> 	}
> 	
> 	void f()
> 	{
> 	}
> 	
> 	//
>
> 	void ff()
> 	{
> 		f();
> 	}
> }
>
> int main(char[][] args)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
> ##############
> $ dmd OneNotZero.d -I~/dmd/src/phobos
> OneNotZero.d(5): need 'this' to access member f
> ##############
> if the static method f is defined after
> the non static method f compiles OK
>
> I found this when the compiler issued the message:
> "./leds/ProjectTarget.d(664): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 0"
> on a similar situation
>
> Ant
>



-- 
D Newsgroup.

On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 22:44:49 -0700, C wrote:

> Yea ive never seen static { } , I dont think that should be allowed ( or is that the bug your reporting ? )
> 
> This compiles though

No, it does not for me, maybe platfom it's specific
I'm on linux dmd 0.81.

you can have for all the modifiers:

static:		from now on (maybe not with static but works for others)
and
static		one member
and
static {}	the block


Ant
############################

> 
> class C
> {
> 	this()
> 	{
> 		f();
> 	}
> 
> 	static void f(int i)
> 	{
> 	}
> 
> 
> 	void f()
> 	{
> 	}
> 
> //
> 
> 	void ff()
> 	{
> 		f();
> 	}
> }
> 
> int main(char[][] args)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:05:07 -0400, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> 
>> this does not compile:
>>
>> ##################
>> class C
>> {
>> 	this()
>> 	{
>> 		f();
>> 	}
>> 
>> 	static {
>> 		void f(int i)
>> 		{
>> 		}
>> 	}
>> 
>> 	void f()
>> 	{
>> 	}
>> 
>> 	//
>>
>> 	void ff()
>> 	{
>> 		f();
>> 	}
>> }
>>
>> int main(char[][] args)
>> {
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>> ##############
>> $ dmd OneNotZero.d -I~/dmd/src/phobos
>> OneNotZero.d(5): need 'this' to access member f
>> ##############
>> if the static method f is defined after
>> the non static method f compiles OK
>>
>> I found this when the compiler issued the message: "./leds/ProjectTarget.d(664): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 0" on a similar situation
>>
>> Ant
>>

Hmm, it works for me using .82, maybe try that ?

> you can have for all the modifiers:
>
> static:		from now on (maybe not with static but works for others)
> and
> static		one member
> and
> static {}	the block

Cool!

C

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:15:45 -0400, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:

> On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 22:44:49 -0700, C wrote:
>
>> Yea ive never seen static { } , I dont think that should be allowed ( or
>> is that the bug your reporting ? )
>>
>> This compiles though
>
> No, it does not for me, maybe platfom it's specific
> I'm on linux dmd 0.81.
>
> you can have for all the modifiers:
>
> static:		from now on (maybe not with static but works for others)
> and
> static		one member
> and
> static {}	the block
>
>
> Ant
> ############################
>
>>
>> class C
>> {
>> 	this()
>> 	{
>> 		f();
>> 	}
>>
>> 	static void f(int i)
>> 	{
>> 	}
>> 	
>>
>> 	void f()
>> 	{
>> 	}
>>
>> //
>>
>> 	void ff()
>> 	{
>> 		f();
>> 	}
>> }
>>
>> int main(char[][] args)
>> {
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:05:07 -0400, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> this does not compile:
>>>
>>> ##################
>>> class C
>>> {
>>> 	this()
>>> 	{
>>> 		f();
>>> 	}
>>> 	
>>> 	static {
>>> 		void f(int i)
>>> 		{
>>> 		}
>>> 	}
>>> 	
>>> 	void f()
>>> 	{
>>> 	}
>>> 	
>>> 	//
>>>
>>> 	void ff()
>>> 	{
>>> 		f();
>>> 	}
>>> }
>>>
>>> int main(char[][] args)
>>> {
>>> 	return 0;
>>> }
>>> ##############
>>> $ dmd OneNotZero.d -I~/dmd/src/phobos
>>> OneNotZero.d(5): need 'this' to access member f
>>> ##############
>>> if the static method f is defined after
>>> the non static method f compiles OK
>>>
>>> I found this when the compiler issued the message:
>>> "./leds/ProjectTarget.d(664): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 0"
>>> on a similar situation
>>>
>>> Ant
>>>
>



-- 
D Newsgroup.

On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 23:33:23 -0700, C wrote:

> Hmm, it works for me using .82, maybe try that ?

Sorry I mean: linux .82

maybe it's a linux only bug.
or are you on linux?

(some times I'm the first to complain about the new
dmd release, you really thought I wasn't at 82?... ;)

Ant

> you can have for all the modifiers:
>
> static: from now on (maybe not with static but works for others)
> and
> static one member
> and
> static {} the block

Is this just a new feature?
I didnt know D had static blocks, good news!

Phill.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 3/31/2004

> (some times I'm the first to complain about the new
> dmd release, you really thought I wasn't at 82?... ;)

lol good point.  No im on windows, but unless its a linking error it seems really odd that that would fail on linux, but succeed on windows. <shrug>

But I do get the same error message ( f.d(5): need 'this' to access member f ) when using the static { } block, which seems like a bug.

C

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:36:27 -0400, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:

> On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 23:33:23 -0700, C wrote:
>
>> Hmm, it works for me using .82, maybe try that ?
>
> Sorry I mean: linux .82
>
> maybe it's a linux only bug.
> or are you on linux?
>
> (some times I'm the first to complain about the new
> dmd release, you really thought I wasn't at 82?... ;)
>
> Ant
>



-- 
D Newsgroup.

In article <c4qrut$2juj$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Phill says...
>
>> you can have for all the modifiers:
>>
>> static: from now on (maybe not with static but works for others)
>> and
>> static one member
>> and
>> static {} the block
>
>Is this just a new feature?
>I didnt know D had static blocks, good news!
>
>Phill.

I just check to confirm I'm not going crazy.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/attribute.html

All attributes can use the 3 forms including: static{}else{}

Ant