Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 16, 2021 DIP 1034--Add a Bottom Type (reboot)--Formal Assessment Concluded | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I expected it would be three or four weeks before I received their final decision. So I was surprised when Walter replied two days later with the following response: "Accepted with pleasure and enthusiasm. This is what DIPs should be like. I intuitively felt that a bottom type was right for D, but failed to express it in DIP1017. Dennis has done it right." Atila was on vacation at the time, but as soon as he got back he responded: "Seconded." Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the Draft Review through to the Final Review. |
February 16, 2021 Re: DIP 1034--Add a Bottom Type (reboot)--Formal Assessment Concluded | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: > > > Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the Draft Review through to the Final Review. And here's the link: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1034.md |
February 16, 2021 Re: DIP 1034--Add a Bottom Type (reboot)--Formal Assessment Concluded | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I expected it would be three or four weeks before I received their final decision. So I was surprised when Walter replied two days later with the following response:
>
> "Accepted with pleasure and enthusiasm. This is what DIPs should be like. I
> intuitively felt that a bottom type was right for D, but failed to express it in
> DIP1017. Dennis has done it right."
>
> Atila was on vacation at the time, but as soon as he got back he responded:
>
> "Seconded."
>
> Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the Draft Review through to the Final Review.
Congratulations, Denis! Having used the `never` type in other languages (e.g. TypeScript), I'm very much looking forward to having it in D!
|
February 16, 2021 Re: DIP 1034--Add a Bottom Type (reboot)--Formal Assessment Concluded | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I expected it would be three or four weeks before I received their final decision. So I was surprised when Walter replied two days later with the following response:
>
> "Accepted with pleasure and enthusiasm. This is what DIPs should be like. I
> intuitively felt that a bottom type was right for D, but failed to express it in
> DIP1017. Dennis has done it right."
>
> Atila was on vacation at the time, but as soon as he got back he responded:
>
> "Seconded."
>
> Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the Draft Review through to the Final Review.
I had been hoping for this so much! Very happy that it got accepted! Congratulations Dennis, you did a great Job with the DIP. Thanks once again for taking that up!
|
February 16, 2021 Re: DIP 1034--Add a Bottom Type (reboot)--Formal Assessment Concluded | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I expected it would be three or four weeks before I received their final decision. So I was surprised when Walter replied two days later with the following response:
>
> "Accepted with pleasure and enthusiasm. This is what DIPs should be like. I
> intuitively felt that a bottom type was right for D, but failed to express it in
> DIP1017. Dennis has done it right."
>
> Atila was on vacation at the time, but as soon as he got back he responded:
>
> "Seconded."
>
> Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the Draft Review through to the Final Review.
Great news! Congrats to Dennis.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation