http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86

Your thoughts?

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
>
> Your thoughts?

I guess there's no reason not to, so LGTM.

The use of the deprecated attribute on variables seems misguided in the first place though. I don't see much use for it vs possible use on functions, structs, classes, and modules other than with global variables.

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
>
> Your thoughts?

HAHAHAHAHA consistency, good one :)

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:54:01 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
>>
>> Your thoughts?
>
> I guess there's no reason not to, so LGTM.
>
> The use of the deprecated attribute on variables seems misguided in the first place though. I don't see much use for it vs possible use on functions, structs, classes, and modules other than with global variables.

The number 10 is now deprecated. Please use 11 instead, which is 1 better.

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
>
> Your thoughts?

OK. Is deprecated on variables used by anyone here?

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 12:33:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> HAHAHAHAHA consistency, good one :)

We can dream.

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
>
> Your thoughts?

Makes sense to me. The current behavior seems needlessly inconsistent.

- Jonathan M Davis