There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!

On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 14:04:10 UTC, JS wrote:
> There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!

Of course, I mean string mixin's using template.. and the statement was to ask people how they went about it...

On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 14:35:52 UTC, JS wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 14:04:10 UTC, JS wrote:
>> There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!
>
> Of course, I mean string mixin's using template.. and the statement was to ask people how they went about it...

I usually write unittests that print the result of the template to the console to see if everything generates properly. So instead of:

mixin(Templ!(someArgs));

I write unittest:

unittest {
    import std.stdio;
    writeln(Templ!(sampleArgs));
}