On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 18:25:33 UTC, w0rp wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On 4/15/15 10:44 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
>>> import std.stdio;
>>>
>>> struct Foo {
>>>    bool registered = false;
>>>
>>>    void register(int x) {
>>>        writeln("Registering ", x);
>>>        register = true;
>>>    }
>>> }
>>>
>>> void main() {
>>>    Foo foo;
>>>    foo.register(10);
>>> }
>>
>> Easy, the bug is in DMD improperly accepting property assignment without @property annotation :P
>>
>> -Steve
>
> Yep. Push patches for DIP23. Get it in the compiler already. Make only x.foo legal without @property.

See http://forum.dlang.org/post/kesbfurmakedjqcqljzg@forum.dlang.org

On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 4/15/15 10:44 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
>> import std.stdio;
>>
>> struct Foo {
>>     bool registered = false;
>>
>>     void register(int x) {
>>         writeln("Registering ", x);
>>         register = true;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> void main() {
>>     Foo foo;
>>     foo.register(10);
>> }
>
> Easy, the bug is in DMD improperly accepting property assignment without @property annotation :P
>
> -Steve

writeln = "Now this is abused of the syntax."

On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 13:52:32 UTC, ixid wrote:
> writeln = "Now this is abused of the syntax."

The important question is, can you assign a tuple and get the auto unpacking to kick in ?

On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 21:37:39 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 13:52:32 UTC, ixid wrote:
>> writeln = "Now this is abused of the syntax."
>
> The important question is, can you assign a tuple and get the auto unpacking to kick in ?

"%s %s".writefln = ("foo".tuple = "bar").expand;

On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 22:48:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
> "%s %s".writefln = ("foo".tuple = "bar").expand;

Please make a pull request: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/Idiotmatic-D