On 02-Oct-2015 15:32, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 12:31:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On a whim, I went to [1], which I had previously referenced in the
>> book, and found that all of the content that was previously there has
>> been replaced by a couple of sentences pointing to std.typecons and to
>> [2]. It also says we should no longer refer
>
> [1] http://dlang.org/tuple.html
> [2] http://dlang.org/ctarguments.html

Article used terminology that was then changed sadly nobody felt strong enough to rewrite the article to use AliasSeq (the e-hm actual new name).

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 12:40:02 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 02-Oct-2015 15:32, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 12:31:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>> On a whim, I went to [1], which I had previously referenced in the
>>> book, and found that all of the content that was previously there has
>>> been replaced by a couple of sentences pointing to std.typecons and to
>>> [2]. It also says we should no longer refer
>>
>> [1] http://dlang.org/tuple.html
>> [2] http://dlang.org/ctarguments.html
>
> Article used terminology that was then changed sadly nobody felt strong enough to rewrite the article to use AliasSeq (the e-hm actual new name).

I see. Well, it does mention AliasSeq. While that may work for the std.meta template, I just don't see how that's even a remotely useful name for T...

It really was much easier to explain the tuple mess before these changes were made.