April 02, 2016 Best way to explicitly control the attributes of a template function | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Jack Stouffer and I have been working on a pull request for Phobos to enable runtime dispatch for field and property access:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/4070
(It's useful when directly porting code from dynamic languages like Python.)
Working with fields in this fashion is pretty easy, but I've hit a snag for property methods: if even one of the available property methods is impure, unsafe, etc., then the dispatch function must also be impure/unsafe/whatever.
In order for the dispatch function to be usable in pure/@safe/etc. code, it needs to filter out those property methods which are not. This is simple enough - except that *which* attributes are required cannot be inferred from the context; it must be explicitly specified by the user of the dispatch template - somehow...
A naive way to do it would be this:
template example(string attrs = "pure @safe nothrow @nogc")
{
mixin("void example() " ~ attrs ~ " { /* do something */ }");
}
Which could then be used like this:
example!"pure @safe @SomeUDA"();
That's pretty ugly though, since it requires that all template functions with explicit attribute control be implemented as string mixins.
Is there a better way to do this? If not, I think consideration should be given (long-term) to adding an "attribute set" construct as a new type of template parameter.
| ||||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply