On Monday, 14 August 2017 at 19:07:07 UTC, aberba wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 August 2017 at 21:38:37 UTC, yawniek wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 08:49:33 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> the original goal of vibe-s3 was to allow streaming uploads of large files so that no memory/disk needs to be used.
>> shelling out (calling aws console client) is definitly not an option.
>
> What exactly is missing or not working in its current state?

from what i know file upload/download and multipart is working fine but setting options/headers is currently done via submitting the headers.
thus all the interfaces are a bit crude.
for the rest see the github issues.
please report any problems in the github, also you can submit how you would EXPECT the API to work