On 7/12/16 5:15 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 07:57:37 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 02:27:04 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>>
>>> There was a very lenghty discussion about this in the past. DMD is
>>> correct on that one. The semantic is such as :
>>>
>>> int plusEqual(ref int a, int b) {
>>>   a = a + b;
>>>   return a;
>>> }
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Could this be added to the spec please?
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1429

Great, thanks. I added a comment to that, which in turn caused a bug report. What does the community think? -- Andrei

On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 16:17:18 UTC, kink wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 02:27:04 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> There was a very lenghty discussion about this in the past. DMD is correct on that one.
>
> Great, so after that very lengthy discussion, why did nobody add a frigging test?! Argh.

For what it's worth, the test is in SDC's test suite.

On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 18:44:44 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 16:17:18 UTC, kink wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 02:27:04 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> There was a very lenghty discussion about this in the past. DMD is correct on that one.
>>
>> Great, so after that very lengthy discussion, why did nobody add a frigging test?! Argh.
>
> For what it's worth, the test is in SDC's test suite.

Thanks for letting us know. I'll try to copy them.

On 12 July 2016 at 01:04, Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> LDC recently changed the evaluation order of "+=" (I think unintentionally, some other eval order problems were fixed). Now, it is different from DMD. I am going to argue that I think DMD's order is more useful in the context of fibers, and would like your opinion.
>

When I said stabilize references, I meant references, not *all* side effects. :-)

Assuming that the last conversations I had with kinke are related to this.

On 12.07.2016 19:20, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 7/12/16 5:15 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 07:57:37 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 02:27:04 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There was a very lenghty discussion about this in the past. DMD is
>>>> correct on that one. The semantic is such as :
>>>>
>>>> int plusEqual(ref int a, int b) {
>>>>   a = a + b;
>>>>   return a;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Could this be added to the spec please?
>>
>> https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1429
>
> Great, thanks. I added a comment to that, which in turn caused a bug
> report. What does the community think? -- Andrei

int main() {
    int sum=0;

    int return1_add9tosum() {
        sum += 9;
        return 1;
    }
    sum += return1_add9tosum();
    return sum;
}

pragma(msg, main()); // 1

On 13 July 2016 at 07:20, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 12.07.2016 19:20, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> On 7/12/16 5:15 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 07:57:37 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 02:27:04 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a very lenghty discussion about this in the past. DMD is correct on that one. The semantic is such as :
>>>>>
>>>>> int plusEqual(ref int a, int b) {
>>>>>   a = a + b;
>>>>>   return a;
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Could this be added to the spec please?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1429
>>
>>
>> Great, thanks. I added a comment to that, which in turn caused a bug report. What does the community think? -- Andrei
>
>
> int main() {
>     int sum=0;
>
>     int return1_add9tosum() {
>         sum += 9;
>         return 1;
>     }
>     sum += return1_add9tosum();
>     return sum;
> }
>
> pragma(msg, main()); // 1
>

I see you've found more cases where runtime and ctfe do things differently. ;-)