Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 05, 2015 Different behavior of dmd and ldc2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi! Simple test: File "a.d" contained this: --- module tst; import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Hello world"); } ---- After compiling this file by "dmd a.d" I get executable with name "a". After compiling by "ldc2 a.d" - executable with name "tst". I do not know, who more right in this situation, but DMD is a "reference compiler" and his behavior "more correct", I think. WBR, Fyodor. |
November 07, 2015 Re: Different behavior of dmd and ldc2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Fyodor Ustinov | On Thursday, 5 November 2015 at 21:51:09 UTC, Fyodor Ustinov wrote: > Hi! > > Simple test: > File "a.d" contained this: > --- > module tst; > > import std.stdio; > > void main() { > writeln("Hello world"); > } > ---- > > After compiling this file by "dmd a.d" I get executable with name "a". > After compiling by "ldc2 a.d" - executable with name "tst". > > I do not know, who more right in this situation, but DMD is a "reference compiler" and his behavior "more correct", I think. > > WBR, > Fyodor. Hi Fyodor! ldc2 does not have the goal to be compatible in all aspects with dmd. So this behaviour is ok. But: ldmd2 is meant to be compatible with dmd. This tool has the same problem which is clearly a bug. Please create a bug report at https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues. Regards, Kai |
November 07, 2015 Re: Different behavior of dmd and ldc2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kai Nacke Attachments:
| I'm wondering whether should fix this together with making -singleobj the default for executable builds, and any other, similar issues. - David --- Sent from a mobile device. On 7 Nov 2015 14:50, "Kai Nacke via digitalmars-d-ldc" < digitalmars-d-ldc@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 5 November 2015 at 21:51:09 UTC, Fyodor Ustinov wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Simple test: >> File "a.d" contained this: >> --- >> module tst; >> >> import std.stdio; >> >> void main() { >> writeln("Hello world"); >> } >> ---- >> >> After compiling this file by "dmd a.d" I get executable with name "a". After compiling by "ldc2 a.d" - executable with name "tst". >> >> I do not know, who more right in this situation, but DMD is a "reference compiler" and his behavior "more correct", I think. >> >> WBR, >> Fyodor. >> > > Hi Fyodor! > > ldc2 does not have the goal to be compatible in all aspects with dmd. So this behaviour is ok. But: ldmd2 is meant to be compatible with dmd. This tool has the same problem which is clearly a bug. Please create a bug report at https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues. > > Regards, > Kai > |
November 09, 2015 Re: Different behavior of dmd and ldc2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kai Nacke | On Saturday, 7 November 2015 at 13:47:13 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> ldc2 does not have the goal to be compatible in all aspects with dmd. So this behaviour is ok. But: ldmd2 is meant to be compatible with dmd. This tool has the same problem which is clearly a bug. Please create a bug report at https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues.
Done.
WBR,
Fyodor.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation