On Saturday, 1 October 2016 at 13:43:02 UTC, yawniek wrote:
> On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 09:41:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
>> [...]
>
> its definitly 100% usabe, we use it in production.
> and it has a much easier API than all the other libs.
> we created it especially for the purpose of easy (and blazing fast!) data extraction from json.
> give it a spin and report feedback.
> unfortunately i have not had the time yet to write a more detailed blog article.
> The reason the warning is there is:
> - validation: we usually do not care about a few corrupt records within millions, thus there is this feature  to silently ignore those, i think you still can make these records fail loudly.
> - we don't know yet where asdf is bad at, thus we need more feedback
> - we are open to change the naming convention of the attributes if someone comes up with good reasoning

 It would definitely be great to see an article about asdf for the D blog IMHO. I'd like to see it in action in a real case as thoses are much better at showing the strength of the library. If you could throw some time at it it would be awesome.