On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:22:18 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 27.07.2016 14:21, lkfsdg wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:19:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:14:39 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:
>>>> IDE or text editor with special features for D, everytbody uses one
>>>
>>> me not.
>>
>> perfect, so your the exception that confirm the rule.
>
> Exceptions don't confirm the rule. They disprove the rule.

That's an idiomatic expression in my native language. It's possible that it doesn't exist in English.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27exception_qui_confirme_la_r%C3%A8gle

http://www.linguee.fr/francais-anglais/traduction/c'est+l'exception+qui+confirme+la+r%C3%A8gle.html

On 27.07.2016 16:27, lkfsdg wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:22:18 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 27.07.2016 14:21, lkfsdg wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:19:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:14:39 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:
>>>>> IDE or text editor with special features for D, everytbody uses one
>>>>
>>>> me not.
>>>
>>> perfect, so your the exception that confirm the rule.
>>
>> Exceptions don't confirm the rule. They disprove the rule.
>
> That's an idiomatic expression in my native language. It's possible that
> it doesn't exist in English.
>
> https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27exception_qui_confirme_la_r%C3%A8gle
>
> http://www.linguee.fr/francais-anglais/traduction/c'est+l'exception+qui+confirme+la+r%C3%A8gle.html
>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule

On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:27:06 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:22:18 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 27.07.2016 14:21, lkfsdg wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:19:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:14:39 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:
>>>>> IDE or text editor with special features for D, everytbody uses one
>>>>
>>>> me not.
>>>
>>> perfect, so your the exception that confirm the rule.
>>
>> Exceptions don't confirm the rule. They disprove the rule.
>
> That's an idiomatic expression in my native language. It's possible that it doesn't exist in English.
>
> https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27exception_qui_confirme_la_r%C3%A8gle
>
> http://www.linguee.fr/francais-anglais/traduction/c'est+l'exception+qui+confirme+la+r%C3%A8gle.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule

On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:30:45 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 27.07.2016 16:27, lkfsdg wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:22:18 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>> On 27.07.2016 14:21, lkfsdg wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:19:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 12:14:39 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:
>>>>>> IDE or text editor with special features for D, everytbody uses one
>>>>>
>>>>> me not.
>>>>
>>>> perfect, so your the exception that confirm the rule.
>>>
>>> Exceptions don't confirm the rule. They disprove the rule.
>>
>> That's an idiomatic expression in my native language. It's possible that
>> it doesn't exist in English.
>>
>> https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27exception_qui_confirme_la_r%C3%A8gle
>>
>> http://www.linguee.fr/francais-anglais/traduction/c'est+l'exception+qui+confirme+la+r%C3%A8gle.html
>>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule

I should use "prove" instead of "confirm". So now you get what i meant.

On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:53:59 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:

>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule
>
> I should use "prove" instead of "confirm". So now you get what i meant.

I for my part knew what you meant, but it was wrong. There are loads of people in the D community that don't use IDEs.

On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 15:19:15 UTC, Chris wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 14:53:59 UTC, lkfsdg wrote:
>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule
>>
>> I should use "prove" instead of "confirm". So now you get what i meant.
>
> I for my part knew what you meant, but it was wrong. There are loads of people in the D community that don't use IDEs.

Later I said 'IDE or text editor with special features for D...' (e.g people using DCD on TextAdept or their cutting-edge console mode text editor...).

This makes me think to a phobos Bug, seen monthes ago:

One templatized function, two overloads. Apparently the second overload was added without unittest. It's been there for monthes. One day somones managed to instantiate it in its code and got an error about "unknown module: std.whatever".
The guy who added the second overload didn't use an IDE. with completion he wouldn't have typed an invalid module name. True story ;)

On 7/27/2016 6:31 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> My thing is still slightly buggy but I have somewhat bigger plans for it, making
> my own source viewer instead of using Github's slow, generic, slow thing that is
> really slow. (Seriously, it is unusably slow on my laptop on anything more than
> like 100 lines, locking up the web browser and killing battery.)

This problem appears to be specific to Windows Explorer. Github works much better with Chrome. I do not understand why Microsoft does not fix this, surely they have plenty of developers who use Github.

I held off switching to Chrome for a long time because of the telemetry. But since Microsoft decided to add pervasive telemetry, there's no longer any reason to use Explorer.