https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/raw/master/docs/Lifetimes%20I%20and%20II%20-%20v0.9.1.pdf

A worthwhile read for those interested in where C++ is heading with regards to static analysis etc.

External analyzers might be an interesting direction for a gc-free D as it might be less intrusive than what Rust is doing.

E.g.:

1. Develop using the manual annotations, but use the GC to prevent memory issues during initial coding.

2. Run checker and fix the code. Turn off GC.

3. Run in debugger, fix code, go to 2.

?

On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 11:52:53 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/raw/master/docs/Lifetimes%20I%20and%20II%20-%20v0.9.1.pdf
>
> A worthwhile read for those interested in where C++ is heading with regards to static analysis etc.
>
> External analyzers might be an interesting direction for a gc-free D as it might be less intrusive than what Rust is doing.
>
> E.g.:
>
> 1. Develop using the manual annotations, but use the GC to prevent memory issues during initial coding.
>
> 2. Run checker and fix the code. Turn off GC.
>
> 3. Run in debugger, fix code, go to 2.
>
> ?

I'd add a "Profile" step but this article is indeed interesting, thanks :-)

On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 11:52:53 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/raw/master/docs/Lifetimes%20I%20and%20II%20-%20v0.9.1.pdf
>

Video from the presentation at CppCon:

https://youtu.be/hEx5DNLWGgA