I don't have a github account.

I propose we should create a branch in phobos (this is exactly what branches should be for).? I think I have commit access to Phobos, and you should be getting it soon.

Phobos owners: is there any requirements for making a branch to develop new incomplete features?

-Steve



----- Original Message ----
> From: Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net>
> 
> I guess we should have the Windows functionality more or less in place before committing it to Phobos.? Besides, I don't have write access there yet.

If it's OK with you, I suggest we work out of my repo for the time
> being.? I don't mind giving you access to it.? Do you have a GitHub user account?

In the meantime I'll contact Andrei and arrange access to
> the Phobos SVN repository.

On 03/14/2010 10:33 AM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> I don't have a github account.
>
> I propose we should create a branch in phobos (this is exactly what branches should be for).  I think I have commit access to Phobos, and you should be getting it soon.
>
> Phobos owners: is there any requirements for making a branch to develop new incomplete features?

No. Go ahead.

Andrei

Oh, I didn't know that was possible.  That's a way better idea.

-Lars



Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> I don't have a github account.
> 
> I propose we should create a branch in phobos (this is exactly what branches should be for).  I think I have commit access to Phobos, and you should be getting it soon.
> 
> Phobos owners: is there any requirements for making a branch to develop new incomplete features?
> 
> -Steve
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net>
>>
>> I guess we should have the Windows functionality more or less in place before committing it to Phobos.  Besides, I don't have write access there yet.
> 
> If it's OK with you, I suggest we work out of my repo for the time
>> being.  I don't mind giving you access to it.  Do you have a GitHub user account?
> 
> In the meantime I'll contact Andrei and arrange access to
>> the Phobos SVN repository.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

I've committed the files now, but note that it currently doesn't compile due to bug 3979.

It did compile when it was in my private tree as ltk.process, though, so I really don't think there's a problem with the code itself.

A workaround is to change the STD_MODULES variable in the makefile so that process.d is the first file passed to DMD.  This allows you to make the debug and release builds, but the unittest build still fails.

-Lars


Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> I don't have a github account.
> 
> I propose we should create a branch in phobos (this is exactly what branches should be for).  I think I have commit access to Phobos, and you should be getting it soon.
> 
> Phobos owners: is there any requirements for making a branch to develop new incomplete features?
> 
> -Steve
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net>
>>
>> I guess we should have the Windows functionality more or less in place before committing it to Phobos.  Besides, I don't have write access there yet.
> 
> If it's OK with you, I suggest we work out of my repo for the time
>> being.  I don't mind giving you access to it.  Do you have a GitHub user account?
> 
> In the meantime I'll contact Andrei and arrange access to
>> the Phobos SVN repository.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos