December 31, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 1.076 and 2.061 beta 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Am 30.12.2012 22:07, schrieb Walter Bright: > > I've been posting regular builds. > > No comments in a while - are we good to go? > Everything compiles fine for me now (I noticed that overloading on "ref"ness is declaration order dependent, not sure what the plan is for that). However, I now get some data corruption in seemingly innocent places at runtime and some crashes with unhelpful stack traces. It wasn't possible to debug this in a hurry and I won't get to this until Wednesday, though. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
December 31, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 1.076 and 2.061 beta 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | 12/31/2012 1:07 AM, Walter Bright пишет: > > On 12/26/2012 3:00 AM, Walter Bright wrote: >> Concomitant with the staging branch, here are the first betas: >> >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip > > > I've been posting regular builds. > > No comments in a while - are we good to go? > Sadly can't test right now if latest beta's Phobos contains the bugfix for: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 it was quite recently discovered & fixed. I think it's not in staging yet and I'd hate to see 2.061 shipped without it. > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta@puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta -- Dmitry Olshansky _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
December 31, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 1.076 and 2.061 beta 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dmitry Olshansky | On 12/31/2012 6:17 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > > Sadly can't test right now if latest beta's Phobos contains the bugfix for: > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 > > it was quite recently discovered & fixed. I think it's not in staging yet and I'd hate to see 2.061 shipped without it. I cherry-picked it. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
January 01, 2013 Re: [dmd-beta] D 1.076 and 2.061 beta 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sönke Ludwig | Am 31.12.2012 15:10, schrieb Sönke Ludwig: > However, I now get some data corruption in seemingly innocent places at runtime and some crashes with unhelpful stack traces. It wasn't possible to debug this in a hurry and I won't get to this until Wednesday, though. Found one cause: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9248 _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation