September 23, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ilya Yaroshenko | On 09/23/2016 06:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe
> Andrei?)
Shall we wait until Monday morning so that you have time to update the blog and it has more impact on Reddit? :)
Ali
|
September 23, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ali Çehreli | On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 18:14:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 06:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe
>> Andrei?)
>
> Shall we wait until Monday morning so that you have time to update the blog and it has more impact on Reddit? :)
>
> Ali
Yes, good idea. Will add Apple and Intel implementations.
|
September 23, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ali Çehreli | On 09/23/2016 02:14 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 06:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe
>> Andrei?)
>
> Shall we wait until Monday morning so that you have time to update the
> blog and it has more impact on Reddit? :)
Yah awes
|
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joakim | On 9/23/2016 7:30 AM, Joakim wrote:
> People don't just want speed and portability, they want ease of use. Show them
> that D will be easier.
Fast code, fast!
|
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ilya Yaroshenko | On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe
> Andrei?)
I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum. -- Andrei
|
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe
>> Andrei?)
>
> I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum. -- Andrei
Roger that.
|
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:13:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: > On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: >>> Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe >>> Andrei?) >> >> I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum. -- Andrei > > Roger that. Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobakhke@forum.dlang.org |
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ilya Yaroshenko | On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobakhke@forum.dlang.org
Working on it in an hour, with such a strong headline we should avoid mistakes.
|
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Martin Nowak | On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobakhke@forum.dlang.org
>
> Working on it in an hour, with such a strong headline we should avoid mistakes.
Cool! Eigen data was added. Netlib cblas (not blas) required to link Eigen library (Eigen -> Fortran BLAS -> Netlib CBLAS -> D code).
For Eigen:
mkdir build_dir
cd build_dir
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DEIGEN_TEST_AVX=ON -DEIGEN_TEST_FMA=ON build_dir
make blas
|
September 24, 2016 Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ilya Yaroshenko | On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 17:42:10 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>>> Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobakhke@forum.dlang.org
>>
>> Working on it in an hour, with such a strong headline we should avoid mistakes.
>
> Cool! Eigen data was added. Netlib cblas (not blas) required to link Eigen library (Eigen -> Fortran BLAS -> Netlib CBLAS -> D code).
>
> For Eigen:
>
> mkdir build_dir
>
> cd build_dir
>
> cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DEIGEN_TEST_AVX=ON -DEIGEN_TEST_FMA=ON build_dir
>
> make blas
Eigen 3.3 is required
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation