On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 14:44:29 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:

> Hm I am not sure, i just tried lynx (on raspberry pi) and here also the indentation level are 8 spaces.

Perhaps if I switched from using tabs to spaces... I'll try it with one of the posts and get back to you so you can test it... if that's okay with you.

On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 14:44:29 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:

> Hm I am not sure, i just tried lynx (on raspberry pi) and here also the indentation level are 8 spaces.

Turns out, it's GitHub inserting 8 spaces per tab. No idea why anyone would think this appropriate, but there it is.

A workaround you can try for now is to click through to an example code (this won't work on the blog pages, just the code pages) and, at the end of the URL, type: ?ts=3 to get tabs that are three spaces. Any number between 1 and 12 will work, apparently.

Hope this helps for now. I'm still looking into this to find a more permanent solution. This 8 spaces per tab bugs me, too.

On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 14:44:29 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
> Hm I am not sure, i just tried lynx (on raspberry pi) and here also the indentation level are 8 spaces.

For testing purposes, I replaced each tab with three spaces in this post: http://gtkdcoding.com/2019/05/31/0040-messagedialog.html

If this works better for you, let me know and I can do a quick s-n-r on all blog posts and add this as the final prep step as the posts go up.

On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 14:44:29 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
> the indentation level are 8 spaces.

Turns out it's settable in CSS. Tab size for quoted code blocks in the blog posts is now set to three. If you could check a few out and let me know if it's any better. If not, I'll take it down to two... now that I know how easy it is.

On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 16:34:21 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 14:44:29 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
>> the indentation level are 8 spaces.
>
> Turns out it's settable in CSS. Tab size for quoted code blocks in the blog posts is now set to three. If you could check a few out and let me know if it's any better. If not, I'll take it down to two... now that I know how easy it is.

It looks now very nice, thanks a lot.
Wheter you chose 2, 3 or 4 is up to you. 4 is mentioned in Phobos style guide, but it is up to you, what you prefer.

Kind regards
Andre

On Sunday, 18 August 2019 at 17:10:38 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:

> It looks now very nice, thanks a lot.

Excellent. Glad to do it.

> Wheter you chose 2, 3 or 4 is up to you. 4 is mentioned in Phobos style guide, but it is up to you, what you prefer.

I've always been partial to three, but I'm also more of a tab person. Less work, if you see what I'm saying.