| Thread overview | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 30 lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | C++ boost now has a lock-free queue library: It includes single-producer, single-consumer and multi-producer, multi-consumer queues. Better performing libraries: | |||
December 30 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to zoujiaqing | On Saturday, 30 December 2023 at 18:08:06 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote: >C++ boost now has a lock-free queue library: It includes single-producer, single-consumer and multi-producer, multi-consumer queues. Better performing libraries:
| |||
December 31 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to zoujiaqing | On Saturday, 30 December 2023 at 18:08:06 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote: >C++ boost now has a lock-free queue library: It includes single-producer, single-consumer and multi-producer, multi-consumer queues. Better performing libraries: https://code.dlang.org/packages/liblfdsd liblfds for D, from the portable, license-free, lock-free data structure C library (https://www.liblfds.org/). | |||
December 31 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to mw | On Sunday, 31 December 2023 at 04:33:44 UTC, mw wrote: >On Saturday, 30 December 2023 at 18:08:06 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote: >C++ boost now has a lock-free queue library: It includes single-producer, single-consumer and multi-producer, multi-consumer queues. Better performing libraries: https://code.dlang.org/packages/liblfdsd liblfds for D, from the portable, license-free, lock-free data structure C library (https://www.liblfds.org/). It does not support the ARM64 architecture. | |||
December 31 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to zoujiaqing | https://code.dlang.org/packages/rust_interop_d Wrap a Rust implementation then. | |||
January 16 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to mw | On Sunday, 31 December 2023 at 19:06:40 UTC, mw wrote: >https://code.dlang.org/packages/rust_interop_d Wrap a Rust implementation then. What about the lock-free library? | |||
January 16 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to RJ Nowling | On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 01:35:43 UTC, RJ Nowling wrote: >On Sunday, 31 December 2023 at 19:06:40 UTC, mw wrote: >https://code.dlang.org/packages/rust_interop_d Wrap a Rust implementation then. What about the lock-free library? It's not production quality library: | |||
January 16 Re: lock-free library for D? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to RJ Nowling | On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 01:35:43 UTC, RJ Nowling wrote: >On Sunday, 31 December 2023 at 19:06:40 UTC, mw wrote: >https://code.dlang.org/packages/rust_interop_d Wrap a Rust implementation then. What about the lock-free library? We really need lock-free container. | |||
Permalink
Reply
