The first example does not compile any more on DMD090, I guess a side-effect of changing the casting rules.

(To the bottom of the page: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html )

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For example:

	int function(char c) fp;	// declare pointer to a function

	void test()
	{
	    static int foo(char c) { return 6; }

	    fp = foo;
	}
	

is exactly equivalent to:

	int function(char c) fp;

	void test()
	{
	    fp = function int(char c) { return 6;} ;
	}
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

regards,
roel

"Roel Mathys" <roel.mathys@yucom.be> wrote in message news:c8thde$96g$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> The first example does not compile any more on DMD090, I guess a side-effect of changing the casting rules.
>
> (To the bottom of the page: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html )
>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> For example:
>
> int function(char c) fp; // declare pointer to a function
>
> void test()
> {
>     static int foo(char c) { return 6; }
>
>     fp = foo;

this should be:
fp = &foo;

> }
>
>
> is exactly equivalent to:
>
> int function(char c) fp;
>
> void test()
> {
>     fp = function int(char c) { return 6;} ;
> }
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> regards,
> roel

Ivan Senji wrote:
> "Roel Mathys" <roel.mathys@yucom.be> wrote in message
> news:c8thde$96g$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>>The first example does not compile any more on DMD090, I guess a
>>side-effect of changing the casting rules.
>>
>>(To the bottom of the page: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html )
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>For example:
>>
>>int function(char c) fp; // declare pointer to a function
>>
>>void test()
>>{
>>    static int foo(char c) { return 6; }
>>
>>    fp = foo;
> 
> 
> this should be:
> fp = &foo;
> 
> 
>>}
>>
>>
>>is exactly equivalent to:
>>
>>int function(char c) fp;
>>
>>void test()
>>{
>>    fp = function int(char c) { return 6;} ;
>>}
>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>
>>regards,
>>roel
> 
> 
> 
right, but the documentation on this page concerning Function Literals should be updated.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/expression.html

roel

"Roel Mathys" <roel.mathys@yucom.be> wrote in message news:c8uk0h$2ddl$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> right, but the documentation on this page concerning Function Literals should be updated.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/expression.html

Done. Thanks