Thread overview
dStress + SVN
Mar 17, 2007
BCS
Mar 17, 2007
Brad Roberts
Mar 19, 2007
BCS
Mar 31, 2007
BCS
Mar 31, 2007
Thomas Kuehne
Apr 01, 2007
BCS
March 17, 2007
Is there any way that dStress could be put into dsource's svn system? Read-only would be more than enough for everything I'm thinking of.


March 17, 2007
BCS wrote:
> Is there any way that dStress could be put into dsource's svn system? Read-only would be more than enough for everything I'm thinking of.

It's already in SVN, but off of Thomas' site:

    http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html#subversion

That good enough?

Later,
Brad
March 19, 2007
Brad Roberts wrote:
> BCS wrote:
> 
>> Is there any way that dStress could be put into dsource's svn system? Read-only would be more than enough for everything I'm thinking of.
> 
> 
> It's already in SVN, but off of Thomas' site:
> 
>     http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html#subversion
> 
> That good enough?
> 
> Later,
> Brad

yah
March 31, 2007
Reply to Brad,

> BCS wrote:
> 
>> Is there any way that dStress could be put into dsource's svn system?
>> Read-only would be more than enough for everything I'm thinking of.
>> 
> It's already in SVN, but off of Thomas' site:
> 
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html#subversion
> 
> That good enough?
> 
> Later,
> Brad

How up-to-date is it? I haven't seen the most recent batch of tests get comitted yet.


March 31, 2007
BCS schrieb am 2007-03-31:
> Reply to Brad,
>
>> BCS wrote:
>> 
>>> Is there any way that dStress could be put into dsource's svn system? Read-only would be more than enough for everything I'm thinking of.
>>> 
>> It's already in SVN, but off of Thomas' site:
>> 
>> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html#subversion
>> 
>> That good enough?
>> 
>> Later,
>> Brad
>
> How up-to-date is it? I haven't seen the most recent batch of tests get comitted yet.

It should always be up-to-date. I simply forgot to push the lasted batch from my local mirror to the public one.

Thomas


April 01, 2007
Reply to Thomas,

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> It should always be up-to-date. I simply forgot to push the lasted
> batch from my local mirror to the public one.
> 
> Thomas

Wow, I guess I'm not the only one who does that kind of thing. <g>