Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 19, 2004 Why does GDC install C source ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
These GDC-installed directories:
- include/d/etc/c/recls
- include/d/etc/c/stlsoft
- include/d/etc/c/zlib
contain C/C++ code and headers...
Are they really needed for D ?
I thought that "include/d" would only hold
import modules for use with D itself (.d) ?
Especially these two, look useless enough:
> /opt/gdc/include/d/etc/c/zlib/zlib.lib: Microsoft Visual C library
> /opt/gdc/include/d/etc/c/recls/recls.lib: Microsoft Visual C library
Maybe "make install" needs some refinements ?
--anders
|
May 02, 2005 Re: Why does GDC install C source ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Anders F Björklund | Anders F Björklund wrote:
> These GDC-installed directories:
>
> - include/d/etc/c/recls
>
> - include/d/etc/c/stlsoft
>
> - include/d/etc/c/zlib
>
> contain C/C++ code and headers...
>
>
> Are they really needed for D ?
I'll rephrase this one for GDC 0.11:
Why does GDC install the .h headers
for zlib and recls ? And not just the
.d modules (etc/c/zlib.d and std/recls.d)
--anders
PS.
Walter has already rejected moving
etc/c/zlib.d to std/c/zlib.d, so I
won't be discussing that - thank you.
|
May 04, 2005 Re: Why does GDC install C source ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Anders F Björklund | Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Anders F Björklund wrote:
>
>> These GDC-installed directories:
>>
>> - include/d/etc/c/recls
>>
>> - include/d/etc/c/stlsoft
>>
>> - include/d/etc/c/zlib
>>
>> contain C/C++ code and headers...
>>
>>
>> Are they really needed for D ?
>
>
> I'll rephrase this one for GDC 0.11:
>
> Why does GDC install the .h headers
> for zlib and recls ? And not just the
> .d modules (etc/c/zlib.d and std/recls.d)
>
> --anders
>
> PS.
> Walter has already rejected moving
> etc/c/zlib.d to std/c/zlib.d, so I
> won't be discussing that - thank you.
If one were writing C code to interact with the D runtime, it might be useful. I don't think it will interfere with gdc.
OTOH, now that I have moved everything to a version-specific directory, it is difficult to use the headers.
David
|
May 05, 2005 Re: Why does GDC install C source ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Friedman | David Friedman wrote:
>> Why does GDC install the .h headers
>> for zlib and recls ? And not just the
>> .d modules (etc/c/zlib.d and std/recls.d)
>
> If one were writing C code to interact with the D runtime, it might be useful. I don't think it will interfere with gdc.
I guess it's just me being old and grumpy and failing to see what
the zlib and recls C/C++ libraries does in the standard D library...
At least just the headers is better than the full distributions.
It's not really a big deal (what's 800K) and it will not interfere.
--anders
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation