If anyone's feeling philanthropic, I wanted to ask a favour.

Basically, I'd like you to download the new Open-RJ (v 1.3.2) - http://openrj.org/ - that I updated yesterday with new test programs and changed documentation, in answer to some criticisms for Rajiv Bhagwat on the discoverability of the code, and let me know if any of that seems promising in terms of how STLSoft's documentation might be improved.

In looking for STLSoft bits of documentation to compare, please check out the ACESTL components, which received a reasonable amount of effort in the 1.8.3 preparation process. It's likely to be as good as any other STLSoft documentation (which may not be saying much, of course).

If you don't think that that's suitable for STLSoft - since it's not a single, simple, library, but a collection of disparate libraries - do you have any suggestions?

Thanks in advance

Matthew

OpenRJ's website still says "Current Version 1.0.1". Downloads page is ok...

"Matthew" <admin.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:d73ru7$1s0a$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> If anyone's feeling philanthropic, I wanted to ask a favour.
>
> Basically, I'd like you to download the new Open-RJ (v 1.3.2) - http://openrj.org/ - that I updated yesterday with new test programs and changed documentation, in answer to some criticisms for Rajiv Bhagwat on the discoverability of the code, and let me know if any of that seems promising in terms of how STLSoft's documentation might be improved.
>
> In looking for STLSoft bits of documentation to compare, please check out the ACESTL components, which received a reasonable amount of effort in the 1.8.3 preparation process. It's likely to be as good as any other STLSoft documentation (which may not be saying much, of course).

Will do... in a while..

> If you don't think that that's suitable for STLSoft - since it's not a single, simple, library, but a collection of disparate libraries - do you have any suggestions?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Matthew


Pablo

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d75h7j$7fv$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> OpenRJ's website still says "Current Version 1.0.1". Downloads page is ok...

I know. Greg was handling the website, but has been busy, and I'm too stupid to work out how to update webpages on SF.net.

You're _most_ welcome to join the project, and help out ...

> "Matthew" <admin.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:d73ru7$1s0a$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> If anyone's feeling philanthropic, I wanted to ask a favour.
>>
>> Basically, I'd like you to download the new Open-RJ (v 1.3.2) - http://openrj.org/ - that I updated yesterday with new test programs and changed documentation, in answer to some criticisms for Rajiv Bhagwat on the discoverability of the code, and let me know if any of that seems promising in terms of how STLSoft's documentation might be improved.
>>
>> In looking for STLSoft bits of documentation to compare, please check out the ACESTL components, which received a reasonable amount of effort in the 1.8.3 preparation process. It's likely to be as good as any other STLSoft documentation (which may not be saying much, of course).
>
> Will do... in a while..

Nice one.