January 08, 2007 nedmalloc vs dmc standard allocator results. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Here are the differences when compiled using DMC. See the othe thread on how to get nedmalloc to compile under DMC. dmc -o -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0501 test.c Standard DMC allocator: 624583.696090 ops/sec under 2 threads. Nedmalloc allocator: 3109062.452439 ops/sec under 2 threads. Nedmalloc is 4.977816 times faster than standard. Zz |
January 09, 2007 Re: nedmalloc vs dmc standard allocator results. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to zz | zz wrote:
> Here are the differences when compiled using DMC.
> See the othe thread on how to get nedmalloc to compile under DMC.
>
> dmc -o -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0501 test.c
>
> Standard DMC allocator: 624583.696090 ops/sec under 2 threads.
> Nedmalloc allocator: 3109062.452439 ops/sec under 2 threads.
>
> Nedmalloc is 4.977816 times faster than standard.
>
> Zz
Wow, is there anyway of getting this or something like it into the standard library?
-Joel
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation