February 10, 2007 Re: Reviewing Phobos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tomas Lindquist Olsen | Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
>
>> One of the original
>> goals of Ares, and transitively for Tango, was to define a strict and
>> logical separation between the core components of a D application: the
>> compiler runtime code, the garbage collector, and the standard library
>> itself.
>
> It would be really nice if phobos and Tango could share the lowest levels.
> Compiler runtime code and garbage collector.
I agree :-)
Sean
|
February 11, 2007 Re: Reviewing Phobos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | Sean Kelly Wrote:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> > Sean Kelly wrote:
> >
> >> One of the original
> >> goals of Ares, and transitively for Tango, was to define a strict and
> >> logical separation between the core components of a D application: the
> >> compiler runtime code, the garbage collector, and the standard library
> >> itself.
> >
> > It would be really nice if phobos and Tango could share the lowest levels. Compiler runtime code and garbage collector.
>
> I agree :-)
>
>
> Sean
Me too, and thanks for the great response explaining things a couple posts back.
I had naively assumed that the core runtime code was external to phobos but if I had not thought it through.
|
February 13, 2007 Re: Reviewing Phobos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tomas Lindquist Olsen | Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
>
>> One of the original
>> goals of Ares, and transitively for Tango, was to define a strict and
>> logical separation between the core components of a D application: the
>> compiler runtime code, the garbage collector, and the standard library
>> itself.
>
> It would be really nice if phobos and Tango could share the lowest levels.
> Compiler runtime code and garbage collector.
>
Yes, I hope this will happen, too....
L.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation