On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:34:40 +0000 (UTC), James Mansion wrote:
>> But I really don't see a reason why there is a need for two
> linkers when one
>> of the linkers is Open Source (and written in C).
>> Christof
> Have you looked at uldar?

Have you looked at it?

It says "uld COFF linker" which doesn't look like it would be of much use for Digital Mars at the moment...


Christof

-- 
http://cmeerw.org                              sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org                   xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org

== Quote from Christof Meerwald (NOSPAM-seeMySig@cmeerw.org)'s > It says "uld COFF linker" which doesn't look like it would be of much use
> for Digital Mars at the moment...
> Christof

Well, I *use* it, but fair cop I guess.

I'm assuming the current situation is untenable.


How far from usable is the OpenWatcom stuff?

I used to like the Watcom compiler and toolset but it got so crufty that its been hard to justify any time at all.

Robert M. Münch wrote:
> What I do at the moment as well. My sugestion is directed to avoid that I have to add "|| defined __DMC__" at several places.

I understand, but I think it is just wrong for DMC to predefine _MSC_VER.