What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..

So why use pure, and when should we use it?

Reply to wyverex,

> What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some
> simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..
> 
> So why use pure,

I don't 

> and when should we use it?

After it gets implemented (IIRC)

BCS wrote:
> Reply to wyverex,
> 
>> What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some
>> simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..
>>
>> So why use pure,
> 
> I don't
>> and when should we use it?
> 
> After it gets implemented (IIRC)
> 
> 
So I've been messing with something thats not implemented?!?!
Blah..

Wyverex wrote:
> BCS wrote:
>> Reply to wyverex,
>>
>>> What benefit is there in using pure?  Messed around with it on some
>>> simple functions and there is no difference reported by the profiler..
>>>
>>> So why use pure,
>>
>> I don't
>>> and when should we use it?
>>
>> After it gets implemented (IIRC)
>>
>>
> So I've been messing with something thats not implemented?!?!
> Blah..

I think the reason its there is so people can start using it in there code and they won't have backwoods compatibility issues when it is actually implemented.