On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> 3) by anonymous:
>
> PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI
> SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084
>

3 (but as others have noted, the font needs to change)

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
>
> 1) by ponce:
>
> Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
> Variant 2: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/p0nce/dconf.org/4f0f2b5be8ec2b06e3feb01d6472ec13a7be4e7c/2016/images/logo2-sample.png
>
> 2) by Jonas Drewsen:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/188292/g4421.png
>
> 3) by anonymous:
>
> PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI
> SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

3. Try different color please.

#3 is the most elegant and applicable on anything (cards, pens, t-shirts, business cards, you name it.

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
>
> 1) by ponce:
>
> Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
> Variant 2: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/p0nce/dconf.org/4f0f2b5be8ec2b06e3feb01d6472ec13a7be4e7c/2016/images/logo2-sample.png
>
> 2) by Jonas Drewsen:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/188292/g4421.png
>
> 3) by anonymous:
>
> PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI
> SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

2

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
>
> 1) by ponce:
>
> Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
> Variant 2: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/p0nce/dconf.org/4f0f2b5be8ec2b06e3feb01d6472ec13a7be4e7c/2016/images/logo2-sample.png
>
> 2) by Jonas Drewsen:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/188292/g4421.png
>
> 3) by anonymous:
>
> PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI
> SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

1.2

Atila

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
>
> 1) by ponce:
>
> Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
> Variant 2: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/p0nce/dconf.org/4f0f2b5be8ec2b06e3feb01d6472ec13a7be4e7c/2016/images/logo2-sample.png
>
> 2) by Jonas Drewsen:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/188292/g4421.png
>
> 3) by anonymous:
>
> PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI
> SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

3.

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
>
> 1) by ponce:
>
> Variant 1: https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
> Variant 2: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/p0nce/dconf.org/4f0f2b5be8ec2b06e3feb01d6472ec13a7be4e7c/2016/images/logo2-sample.png
>
> 2) by Jonas Drewsen:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/188292/g4421.png
>
> 3) by anonymous:
>
> PNG: http://imgur.com/GX0HUFI
> SVG: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ef7282dfec9ab327084
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

3 png

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:

2

Note:
3 can use more saturated colors (like 2) and other font. Then I would go with 3.

I prefer 3. It's simple, but effective. The graphic looks like an Olympic torch to me, which is good, indicating that D is a champion! :-)

IMHO 2 needs the graphic to be more stylistic, otherwise it's good and simple. If it is improved, maybe it can be used later/elsewhere.

But I don't get the message of 1. The graphic is too complicated, and the significance of its components is not self-evident.

Appreciate the work people are putting into this, though. No offence to any artist intended...

-- 
Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:

3.