Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 18, 2011 Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
The review of std.net.curl is done and the voting has started. I'm loving this steady pipeline of reviews and additions to Phobos. According to http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue, there's nothing ready for review now, though. Jacob Carlborg, are you ready to have std.serialize reviewed for inclusion in Phobos in a week? Serialization is a pretty high priority and should be reviewed ASAP if it's ready. Otherwise, does anyone else have something to fill in the bubble in the queue? I'd like to start a new review after the std.net.curl vote is done. |
December 18, 2011 Re: Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to dsimcha | On 18-12-2011 21:24, dsimcha wrote:
> The review of std.net.curl is done and the voting has started. I'm
> loving this steady pipeline of reviews and additions to Phobos.
> According to http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue, there's
> nothing ready for review now, though.
>
> Jacob Carlborg, are you ready to have std.serialize reviewed for
> inclusion in Phobos in a week? Serialization is a pretty high priority
> and should be reviewed ASAP if it's ready. Otherwise, does anyone else
> have something to fill in the bubble in the queue? I'd like to start a
> new review after the std.net.curl vote is done.
I hate to be the one doing this, but can I nitpick on the name? std.serialization sounds much better than std.serialize for a module name.
In any case, +1 for having Orange up for review next! Would definitely like to see it in Phobos ASAP.
- Alex
|
December 19, 2011 Re: Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to dsimcha | On 2011-12-18 21:24, dsimcha wrote: > The review of std.net.curl is done and the voting has started. I'm > loving this steady pipeline of reviews and additions to Phobos. > According to http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue, there's > nothing ready for review now, though. > > Jacob Carlborg, are you ready to have std.serialize reviewed for > inclusion in Phobos in a week? Serialization is a pretty high priority > and should be reviewed ASAP if it's ready. Otherwise, does anyone else > have something to fill in the bubble in the queue? I'd like to start a > new review after the std.net.curl vote is done. I guess so. I have a few things I would like to fix first, it currently doesn't build on latest DMD because of the deprecated typedef. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
December 20, 2011 Re: Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alex Rønne Petersen | On 18/12/2011 21:17, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 18-12-2011 21:24, dsimcha wrote:
>> The review of std.net.curl is done and the voting has started. I'm
>> loving this steady pipeline of reviews and additions to Phobos.
>> According to http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue, there's
>> nothing ready for review now, though.
>>
>> Jacob Carlborg, are you ready to have std.serialize reviewed for
>> inclusion in Phobos in a week? Serialization is a pretty high priority
>> and should be reviewed ASAP if it's ready. Otherwise, does anyone else
>> have something to fill in the bubble in the queue? I'd like to start a
>> new review after the std.net.curl vote is done.
>
> I hate to be the one doing this, but can I nitpick on the name?
> std.serialization sounds much better than std.serialize for a module name.
>
> In any case, +1 for having Orange up for review next! Would definitely
> like to see it in Phobos ASAP.
>
> - Alex
I recently started abbreviating Serialization as s11n (Es-Eleven-En) in the same vain as i18n for Internationalization and l10n for Localization. Its not my invention, its in use in C/C++ libs and probably other languages too. I think std.s11n; world be an acceptable module name.
A...
|
December 20, 2011 Re: Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alix Pexton | On 2011-12-20 01:52, Alix Pexton wrote: > I recently started abbreviating Serialization as s11n (Es-Eleven-En) in > the same vain as i18n for Internationalization and l10n for > Localization. Its not my invention, its in use in C/C++ libs and > probably other languages too. I think std.s11n; world be an acceptable > module name. > > A... I've never heard that abbreviation. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
December 20, 2011 Re: Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 08:38:28 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-12-20 01:52, Alix Pexton wrote:
> > I recently started abbreviating Serialization as s11n (Es-Eleven-En) in the same vain as i18n for Internationalization and l10n for Localization. Its not my invention, its in use in C/C++ libs and probably other languages too. I think std.s11n; world be an acceptable module name.
> >
> > A...
>
> I've never heard that abbreviation.
Me neither. I'd just go for serialize, because it's completely recognizable and shorter than serialization.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
December 20, 2011 Re: Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On 20/12/2011 07:38, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2011-12-20 01:52, Alix Pexton wrote: > >> I recently started abbreviating Serialization as s11n (Es-Eleven-En) in >> the same vain as i18n for Internationalization and l10n for >> Localization. Its not my invention, its in use in C/C++ libs and >> probably other languages too. I think std.s11n; world be an acceptable >> module name. >> >> A... > > I've never heard that abbreviation. > I got fed up of typing it "the long way" and started using the same abbreviation technique as for i18n (ie firstLetter-#omittedLetters-lastLetter) googled the result and found out I was not the first to have the same idea. I've no more etymological references than that but I never claimed it was common or well known ^^ A... |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation