http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2642





--- Comment #10 from Sobirari Muhomori <maxmo@pochta.ru>  2009-07-09 02:55:33 PDT ---
> > With or without explicit initialization requirements, you could put that initialization in the constructors.
> .init can't be moved to constructor, because you won't be able to set vptr correctly.
Though setting of main vptr can be done in user code and other fields initialization can be moved to constructor (including interface fixups). Though this hardly makes difference in the case of inlining.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2642





--- Comment #11 from Sobirari Muhomori <maxmo@pochta.ru>  2009-07-09 03:13:28 PDT ---
oops... *fix
there's no interface fixups in the object, only vptrs.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2642


Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|spec                        |


--- Comment #12 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2012-01-23 00:13:57 PST ---
Not a spec issue.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------