Thread overview
[Issue 6564] enum with no initializer compiles
Jan 31, 2012
yebblies
Jan 31, 2012
Andrej Mitrovic
Jan 31, 2012
yebblies
Jan 31, 2012
Andrej Mitrovic
January 31, 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564


yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |yebblies@gmail.com
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


--- Comment #1 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2012-01-31 16:59:16 EST ---
enum Length; is a forward declaration to an enum type defined elsewhere.

eg.
--- x.d ---
enum Length
{
 ... members ...
}

--- x.di ---
enum Length;

Not sure this is the greatest thing to allow, but it is correct according to the spec.  Please open an enhancement request to disallow forward declarations of enums is you think this is desirable.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
January 31, 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564



--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2012-01-30 22:19:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> --- x.di ---
> enum Length;

That's not generated by the compiler (at least not 2.057, I don't know about 2.058 HEAD). But how does it make sense to hide enum members anyway? I've never seen D code that uses a forward enum declaration.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
January 31, 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564



--- Comment #3 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2012-01-31 17:25:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That's not generated by the compiler (at least not 2.057, I don't know about
> 2.058 HEAD).

It doesn't get generated by the compiler, but you can still do it.

> But how does it make sense to hide enum members anyway?

An enum declaration creates its own type, so in the same kind of places you'd want to pass around an opaque struct pointer.

> I've never seen D code that uses a forward enum declaration.

Neither have I, but I've seen plenty of C/C++ source that does it. eg dmd

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
January 31, 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564



--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2012-01-30 22:38:43 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> An enum declaration creates its own type, so in the same kind of places you'd want to pass around an opaque struct pointer.

Like "struct Foo;", I see. I've seen opaque structs before but never opaque enums. :)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------